If you are going through a family-based green card case and the U.S. petitioner does not earn enough income to meet the financial requirements on their own, you have two main options to satisfy the Affidavit of Support requirement. You can use assets, or you can bring in a joint sponsor. Both are recognized under immigration law. But they are not equal in practice, and understanding the difference between them, particularly in the current environment, could be the difference between a smooth case and a case that gets delayed or refused.
What is the Affidavit of Support and why does it matter?
The Affidavit of Support, filed on Form I-864, is a legally binding document in which the U.S. petitioner commits to financially supporting the foreign national being sponsored for a green card. It exists to ensure that the incoming immigrant will not become a public charge, meaning dependent on government assistance. USCIS and U.S. embassies take this requirement seriously, and cases that do not clearly satisfy it face delays, requests for additional evidence, and in some cases outright refusals.
The income requirement is based on federal poverty guidelines and requires the petitioner to demonstrate income at or above 125 percent of the poverty level for their household size. If the petitioner’s income falls short of that threshold, the case cannot proceed without either demonstrating sufficient assets or bringing in a joint sponsor.
Can you use assets instead of income to satisfy the requirement?
Technically, yes. Immigration regulations allow assets to be used to supplement or substitute for income on the Affidavit of Support. The formula for converting assets to income equivalent requires the assets to be worth between three and five times the income shortfall, depending on the specific situation and whether the case involves a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident petitioner.
So if the petitioner’s income falls short of the required threshold by a certain amount, they would need to show assets worth (depending on the relationship type) three to five times that shortfall to compensate. For cash assets, this typically means demonstrating a bank account balance averaged over the prior 12 months. The assets must be liquid, meaning they can be converted to cash relatively quickly, and they must be documented thoroughly. Other assets types are possible, but more complicated to prove.
The problem is that proving assets to the satisfaction of immigration authorities is harder than it sounds, and the reception of asset-based Affidavits of Support varies significantly between USCIS and U.S. embassies. USCIS is generally more flexible in accepting assets as a substitute for income. U.S. embassies are considerably more strict, and in the current environment they have become even more demanding about public charge concerns.
Why are embassies stricter about assets than USCIS?
U.S. embassies conduct consular processing for green card cases where the foreign national is outside the United States, and they have historically applied a stricter standard when it comes to public charge determinations. The concern is straightforward from the government’s perspective. An immigrant who arrives in the United States without a petitioner who has reliable ongoing income may become dependent on public resources if circumstances change. Assets can be depleted. A salary is recurring.
Under the current administration, embassy officers have become even more aggressive about public charge concerns. A recent case involving a marriage green card at a U.S. embassy in Mexico illustrates the point. The petitioner had income that appeared to meet the requirement, but the officer refused the case and requested a joint sponsor anyway, citing concern that the foreign national might not be able to financially support themselves if they became ill in the United States. This is the kind of extra-cautious refusal that is becoming more common at embassies under current conditions.
If your case is going through consular processing, relying solely on assets for your Affidavit of Support is a meaningful risk. The embassy may simply not accept it and require a joint sponsor before moving forward, adding delay and complications to your case.
What is a joint sponsor and why is it generally the better option?
A joint sponsor is a person, other than the petitioner, who agrees to also sign the Affidavit of Support and take on the legal obligation to financially support the immigrant. The joint sponsor must be a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, must be at least 18 years old, must be domiciled in the United States, and must meet the income requirement on their own based on their household size.
A joint sponsor with a regular W-2 income, documented through tax returns, pay stubs, and employment verification, presents a clean and easily verifiable financial picture that both USCIS and embassies accept readily. It removes the complexity and uncertainty that comes with trying to prove assets are sufficient and avoids the risk of a public charge concern being raised based on the type of income evidence being submitted.
The practical challenge with a joint sponsor is that you have to ask someone to help you. You are asking them to share their financial information, sign a legally binding document, and take on a financial obligation that technically lasts until the sponsored immigrant becomes a U.S. citizen or can be credited with 40 quarters of work. That is a significant ask, and not everyone has someone in their life who is both willing and financially qualified to serve as a joint sponsor.
What is the bottom line on assets versus joint sponsor?
Use a joint sponsor if you can find one. Assets should be treated as a backup option rather than a primary strategy, particularly if your case involves consular processing at a U.S. embassy. The embassy environment right now is strict on public charge issues, and the cleaner and simpler your financial evidence is, the better your chances of moving through that process without unnecessary delays.
If a joint sponsor is genuinely not available and assets are your only option, work with an immigration attorney to document those assets as thoroughly and compellingly as possible before submitting.
Download our free Ultimate Marriage Green Card Guide at MarriageImmigrationLaw.com, join Attorney John Khosravi, Esq. live every Tuesday at 4 PM PT / 7 PM ET on YouTube, LinkedIn, Instagram, and TikTok for a free Q&A, or book a one-on-one consultation to talk through your specific situation. Schedule a consultation at JQKLaw.com/contact
